GOP: Conveniently Paranoid

Real Reason to Worry About Russia

I am old enough to remember arguing about the U.S.  withdrawal from Vietnam with a 3rd grade friend (Chris) while we did our warm up lap for gym.  We were just kids, parroting what our parents had already told us.  For as long as I remember, it has been taken for granted that we must face down the Soviet Union.  In Chris’ case in particular, his family was Hungarian and I think they were impacted by the 1956 Spring.  Anyway,  the Russians defended Communism, and though they beat back those Nazis during the war, the conventional wisdom always held that they wanted to take all that’s ours.

VIETNAM EVACUATION 1975

U.S. Naval personnel push a Huey helicopter into the sea in order to make room  on an aircraft carrier during the chaotic withdraw from South Vietnam in 1973.

In my lifetime, we have  supported numerous undemocratic South Vietnamese administrations, killed about one million Vietnamese combatants and non combatants, bombed and invaded Cambodia, supported pro western guerrillas in Laos,  supported fascist guerrillas in Nicaragua, briefly invaded the tiny Island nation of Grenada, supported the murderous El Salvadoran government, toppled the socialist Salvador Allende in Chile, supported military dictatorships in Haiti, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, Columbia, Peru, and Argentina.  In Africa, we supported the apartheid regime of South Africa, intervened in the civil war in Angola and interfered in the leadership of Chad when it seemed that their leader sympathized with Muammar Gaddafi.  This is just what I remember off the top of my head.   Also, this is just active military or CIA/Special Operations interference, not economic or diplomatic acts.  Also, this is just during my brief, fifty-three years on this Earth.  All of this shelling,  bombing, napalming, shooting, and overall butchery of soldiers and civilians was intended to face down the Soviet (i.e. Russian) threat.

We also built and maintained an arsenal of nuclear weapons, either in the form of bombs, cruise missiles, intercontinental ballistic missiles, medium and short range missiles stationed in Europe or Turkey, and countless tactical nuclear weapons.  We have maintained military bases in Europe, South Korea, until recently,  Okinawa, the Philippines,  and various other places throughout the world.  In general, we have created a military with destructive power unprecedented in 10,000 years of civilization and which in 2016, for example,  cost us $611 billion.  This was the highest amount spent in the world  and was  still more military spending than the next nine countries combined, only two of which are considered our adversaries.    This price also does not include the price we must pay in interest for the loans to spend this money.

Questions about Military Spending? Ask Forbes.

None of this includes the intellectual and moral price we have paid for generations of carrying on the Grand Facade called the Cold War.  Huge amounts of effort have been applied by academics in colleges and think tanks, dedicated to arguing for or against the Soviet/Russian threat.  Political capital was used to ferret out alleged Russian sympathizers in the U.S. government, academia,  and/or Hollywood; those who were accused were often jailed and/or ruined.  Physicists, mathematicians  and engineers were paid to invent new and more deadly weapons, instead of working on technological steps forward.   Grumman, Raytheon, General Motors and others received our nation’s treasures to build weapons to support this effort.  Although the space race resulted in great technological achievements, it was originally considered just another dimension of fighting the Russian threat.  Protests and counter protests accompanied the interventions mentioned above.  Some of these, such as the Kent State protest had tragic results.  The protest during the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago portrayed an America that resembled Munich in 1930.

dem convention

Chicago Police breaking up protest during the 1968 Democratic convention, Chicago.

Now what do we have?  The Russians are truly working on damaging what is not a perfect democracy, but certainly is better than their backwards dictatorship.  The Russian economy produces nothing  the world wants to buy but weapons and mediocre vodka.  Who has ever bought a Russian or Soviet car?  A Russian cell phone?  Russian construction equipment?  A Russian kitchen mixer? A Russian laptop?

Intellectually, they certainly have some achievements, but they appear to put the most effort into using social media platforms to sow discord and hatred in the U.S., a country that has never reconciled itself to the evils of its past.  They have already been shown to have interfered in the 2016 election, seem to have compromised our President in various ways (I am being kind for now), bought off Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Devin Nunes, other GOP officials  and probably some unprincipled Democratic officials.  They have used the NRA as a means to again sow self-righteous anger as well as the notion that our government is incapable of dealing with the issue of mass shootings.  NOW they are trying to get people to avoid vaccines and make a big, loud and proud point of it, creating further discord, and proliferating disease.

Good Morning, America.  Our Country is under siege.  It is not the juvenile, gun-stroking fantasy that Americans enjoyed when Red Dawn was in theaters.   In that film, Russia physically invaded the country and high school kids became gun toting guerrillas,  fighting like Yankee Doodle Commandoes.  No, this is a siege of our collective intellect  and moral character.  We need leaders in power who know all of this and  have intellectual and moral character.

red dawn

Patrick Swayze, unknown, and Charlie Sheen in the seeming NRA celebration, Red Dawn.

Suggestion

It feels like we should have a civilian version of this so that mass shooting survivors can be recognized publicly. They are selflessly enduring injuries, trauma, and enormous inconvenience so that we may all purchase assault weapons that absolutely no civilian needs.

purple heart

I really should be straddled on this issue, but I am not.  I own a bunch of guns and occasionally go shooting at ranges nearby.  I have two pistols, a Rock Island 1903 .30 rifle, a .17HMR rifle, and I inherited two shotguns that I’ve never fired.  I’m very careful and my 12 year old has no access to them.  I’ve never felt the need for a Kalashnikov or a CAR-15, or any other assault rifle and I don’t get the seemingly phallic attraction people have to them.  I was in the National Guard a long time ago so I’ve fired an M-16 and other more serious weapons.  Yeah, I get it, they’re powerful.  But I get enough of a kick from my old fashioned, bolt action rifle and its little 5 round magazine.

I vacationed with relatives in North Carolina last summer and went shooting with a couple of boobs.  It was fun, though I was still fine just plinking away with my Rock Island.   One of these guys had a vault  full of thousands of dollars of  guns……what the bloody bullocks?  Going out  hunting with a battalion of your closest friends?  And all kinds of ammunition, the kind of rounds SEALS use for silent killing.  Come the heck on!   Is it just a little more satisfying blowing away Bambi with silent savagery?  I just don’t get it.

What really got me, though, was the interaction I had with an old friend from the Guard.  I’ll call him Zivo.  He and I were in the same platoon and sometimes shared rides to and from drill. Sometimes we hung out.  After my ETS date we lost track of each other until recently, at which time we began a mostly texting relationship.  Then the attack on the Temple in Pittsburgh came and I remember texting him about it.  I texted that it appeared to me, as it does now,  that we are in the beginning of what must be the American fourth Civil War.

Although I am the least religious person out there, it was personal to me that a Jewish temple was attacked and that 11 died there.  Attacked specifically because they were Hebes going to shul.    Zivo’s reaction: “Now they’re going to  use this as a reason to put more limits on firearms.”    Seriously?  A bunch of innocent people get killed because of hateful bigotry,  and the concern is why he can’t have a silencer or an extra large magazine?!  Nazis killing Jews in my own country, where my wife lives, where my daughter  walks around ?

No, Zivo, we’re  out of the Guard.  Neither of us, nor anyone else needs a high-powered assault rifle. Ban them.

We haven’t texted since.

This is what guns should sound like

What really needs to be done about the monument to Josef Goebbels, Fox News.

1933:  “The best propaganda is that which, as it were, works invisibly, penetrates the whole of life without the public having any knowledge of the propagandistic initiative.”  Goebbels’ Wikiquote

“Unless you can fake sincerity, you’ll get nowhere in this business.” Roger Stone Quote

I am regrettably not an attorney.  But I am curious:  If an entire staff agrees to tell easily proven false stories and portray them as truthful news, isn’t that Conspiracy to Commit Fraud?  I get the first amendment issue and I agree:  Yes. people have the right to say anything they want.  I would be sad, for example, if the Onion and every other source of clever and funny satire were to disappear.  But the Onion has not claimed to be anything but satire.  Fox claims not just to be non fiction, but in fact to be the only legitimate source of facts, despite its contestable relationship with the truth (except for at least some of  Chris Wallace’s work).

Of course if somebody used whatever power in the Justice Department to go after Fox for Conspiracy to Defraud the public, CNN, and MSNBC, and other stations as well as the NYT and Wapo, etc. would have to make sure they were legally covered as well, which would improve news value everywhere.  It is reasonable that if the FCC shakes its collective rump and call out ALL of the news programs when they present or perpetuate false stories, news in America would have to improve.  At this time, it seems like nobody, except news geeks like me seem to care.    In fact, it is part of the FCC’s job to act on complaints of news distortions.  According to the FCC website, “it is… illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge.”   FCC Website

There has to be documented evidence “such as testimony from persons who have direct personal knowledge of an intentional falsification of the news” in order to act. FCC Website II    What the FCC can truly do is unclear on the website.  I think that the actual process of having to publicly justify questionable articles may go some distance to create more accurate and credible news.    And all of this, of course, will have to wait for the Dollar Store Tyrant to leave office.  This is an idea of what has happened to the FCC lately:   Sinclair, or better known as the Billionaire News Corporation

goebbels

Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Josef Goebbels

stone little

Trump confidante Roger Stone describing himself in INTIMATE detail.

will news

Will McAvoy from HBO’s Newsroom, the best newscaster that never existed.

By the way, watch Will concisely and accurately describe why American News is such epic livestock waste:

Where the problem started

This is “Normal?” “Decent?” More like “Criminal.”

Providing cover for murdering a U.S. Resident? THAT is Presidential.

As a U.S. Ambassador once opined,…” when I see a bird that quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, has feathers and webbed feet and associates with ducks—I’m certainly going to assume that he is a duck.”  Likewise, if the president helps explain away a crime, denies that a crime took place, associates with criminals, then, I am going to assume he is a criminal. Simple as that.

trump jumpsuit

Update:  Check it out:  McCabe on Cobert

Update:  Trump Turnaround on another Member of his Roach Motel   What is amazing in the video is one can hear Trump himself, Kellyanne Conway, Eric Trump, Pence

 

Another case of “Sorry, I guess we were wrong.”

The pill

If HIV was put on this earth by God to punish homosexual behavior and/or intravenous drug users, was God also involved in the lab work performed to create Truvada, a drug  that helps prevent HIV? I’m just curious.

Also, just out of curiosity, who is the tall blonde in this commercial?

The Pill (shameless promotion).